As someone who revels in the opulence of high fashion and has a penchant for exploring the most luxurious hotels around the globe, I’ve always been fascinated by the lifestyles of the icons who’ve shaped our sense of style and luxury. One enigma, Coco Chanel, whose legacy is as timeless as the little black dress, has particularly piqued my interest.
Why did this fashion titan, with all the resources at her disposal, choose a life within the transient walls of hotels rather than settling down in a mansion of her own?
It’s a question that dances on the edge of my curiosity, especially given my own love for the grandeur and service of high-end hotels. Let me take you through what I’ve discovered and pondered, with a touch of humor and a lot of admiration for the iconic Mademoiselle Chanel.
Gabrielle Chanel, a name synonymous with revolutionizing women’s fashion, found her sanctuary in the elegant embrace of hotels, notably the Ritz Paris. This wasn’t just a choice; it was a declaration of her independence and a reflection of her avant-garde lifestyle. Imagine the scene: the 1920s, Paris, the Ritz—a place where luxury isn’t just expected, it’s woven into the very fabric of its being, much like the intricate designs of a Chanel couture piece.
Coco’s Affair With The Ritz
Coco’s affair with the Ritz began in the 20s, not long after she opened her fashion house at 31 rue Cambon, a stone’s throw from the hotel. This wasn’t merely a place to lay her head; it was an extension of her workspace, her social circle, and her private world. The Ritz was where Coco Chanel wasn’t just a guest; she was a part of its soul, its history. It was her home, in the heart of Paris, enveloped in the city’s fashion scene. She was everything opposite to, Dior.
But Coco’s life in hotels wasn’t limited to the Ritz or to Paris. Post-war, she moved to Switzerland, choosing a hotel in upper Lausanne by Lake Geneva as her refuge. This wasn’t a random selection. The backdrop of Lake Geneva offered her a scenic tranquility, a stark contrast to her bustling life in Paris.
But why Switzerland? Why a hotel?
I recently watched “The New Look” on Apple TV, diving into Chanel’s attempts to clear her name of her alleged Nazi affiliations and to reclaim her stake in the iconic Chanel No. 5. It highlighted a period of her life steeped in controversy, during which she sought safety and perhaps anonymity, which a hotel in Switzerland could offer.
This choice of a hotel-centric life begs the question: What about it drew Coco Chanel? Was it the allure of impeccable service at the snap of her fingers? The security and privacy hotels provided, especially during turbulent times? Or perhaps it was the comfort in knowing that, unlike a permanent residence, a hotel was a fortress of sorts, less likely to draw unwanted attention or danger.
Hotels Kept Her Safe
Reflecting on Coco Chanel’s childhood might offer another layer of understanding. Orphaned at a young age, she was raised in a convent—a stark, austere environment that was worlds apart from the opulence she would later surround herself with. Yet, in hotels, she found a middle ground—a place that wasn’t laden with the emotional baggage of a ‘home’ but offered more warmth and personalization than the cold walls of a convent.
For Chanel, hotels might have represented a sanctuary where the memories of her past didn’t echo quite as loudly, where she could craft a new identity unanchored by her origins.
Living in hotels, then, wasn’t just a quirk of Coco Chanel’s lifestyle; it was a meticulously chosen path that mirrored her revolutionary approach to fashion and life. She embraced the transient, the impermanent, not because she lacked the means for a permanent residence, but because it suited her. In hotels, she found the freedom to be herself—unconstrained by societal expectations of home and hearth, moving with the times yet always in control.
For someone like me, who delights in the discovery and luxury of the finest hotels, Coco Chanel’s choice resonates deeply. It’s not just about the allure of constant pampering and luxury; it’s about the freedom it represents. Freedom to move, to be inspired, to live on one’s own terms. Coco Chanel didn’t just create timeless fashion; she lived her life as a testament to the idea that sometimes, the most permanent place for someone who is perpetually in motion is, ironically, somewhere temporary.
In essence, Coco Chanel’s hotel lifestyle was a reflection of her ethos—be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything but mundane. For Chanel, hotels were more than just places to stay; they were stages on which she played out her legendary life, always in style, always on her own terms. And that, dear readers, is a lesson in living not just fashionably, but fearlessly. Coco Chanel didn’t just occupy space in hotels; she owned them, in in the same way she owned every room she walked into—with grace, with power, and always with a touch of mystery.
You must be logged in to post a comment.